For Peer Reviewers

Rejecting a submission

Common reasons for rejecting a paper include:

- Unsound methodology
- Unsound theory, rational or logic
- Failure to add anything new to the knowledge field or to provide new insights
- Faulty interpretation of data or source materials
- Poor quality data
- Badly written or poorly presented work
- Conclusions are not supported by the data.

It is helpful, especially if rejecting a paper, if you can recommend ways in which the submission may be adapted for the journal. For instance, you may feel that a paper is not important enough for a full article but might make a brief research note. A paper rejected as a research article may be more successful as a commentary or viewpoint. You may also be able to recommend a more suitable academic or professional journal. Do note that many journals ask reviewers not to express an opinion in their comments for the authors as to whether or not the submission should be accepted; that is a decision taken by the editor and opinions upon it should be in the confidential comments for the editor.

<< PREVIOUS
NEXT >>

 

 

 

 

parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint parint v